Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 8(47), p. 718-720

DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.8.718

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Brains at necropsy: to fix or not to fix?

Journal article published in 1994 by A. Katelaris, J. Kencian, J. Duflou ORCID, J. M. Hilton
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AIM--To investigate whether routine formalin fixation of all brains coming to necropsy increases the rate of detection of brain abnormalities relative to either selective formalin fixation of brain tissue or fresh dissection of all brain tissue at the time of post mortem examination. METHODS--A retrospective study of 300 medicolegal necropsies was performed. One hundred cases were examined by doctors with little or no formal training in necropsy pathology. One hundred cases were examined by forensic pathologists, who used their discretion as to whether to fix the brain in formalin. A further 100 cases were examined by neuropathologists; all the brains had already been fixed at the time of necropsy. RESULTS--When examined by doctors with little or no formal necropsy pathology training, only 15% of brains were found to be abnormal. In the case of selective fixation, 33% were found to be abnormal. When there was obligatory fixation of all brains, 51% of all brains were found to be abnormal. CONCLUSIONS--It is concluded that formalin fixation of the whole brain at the time of necropsy, followed by detailed examination of the brain by a neuropathologist, significantly increases the detection rate of brain pathology at necropsy.