Published in

World Scientific Publishing, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 09(28), p. 1950118, 2019

DOI: 10.1142/s0218271819501189

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Exploring the dark universe: Constraints on dynamical dark energy models from CMB, BAO and growth rate measurements

Journal article published in 2019 by Alexander Bonilla Rivera ORCID, Jorge Enrique García-Farieta
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe, the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant [Formula: see text] and the cosmic coincidence problem, different alternative models have been proposed in the literature. We use the most recent observational data from CMB (Planck 2018 final data release) and LSS (SDSS, WiggleZ, VIPERS) to constrain dynamical dark energy (DE) models. The CMB shift parameter, which traditionally has been used to determine the main cosmological parameters of the standard model [Formula: see text], is employed in addition to data from redshift-space distortions through the growth parameter [Formula: see text] to constrain the mass variance [Formula: see text]. BAO data are also used to study the history of the cosmological expansion and the main properties of DE. From the evolution of [Formula: see text], we found a slowdown of acceleration behavior at low redshifts, and by using the Akaike and Bayesian Information Criteria (AIC, BIC), we discriminate different models to find those that are better suited to the observational data, finding that the interacting dark energy (IDE) model is the most favored by observational data, including information from SNIa and Hz. The analysis shows that the IDE model is followed closely by EDE and [Formula: see text] models, which in some cases fit better the observational data with individual probes.