Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Journal of Rheumatology, The Journal of Rheumatology, 8(46), p. 1021-1027, 2019

DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181096

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaboration of the Conceptual Framework for Outcome Measurement in Health Intervention Studies

Journal article published in 2019 by Maarten Boers ORCID, Dorcas E. Beaton ORCID, Beverley J. Shea, Lara J. Maxwell ORCID, Susan J. Bartlett ORCID, Clifton O. Bingham, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino ORCID, Maarten P. de Wit ORCID, Laure Gossec, Lyn March, Lee S. Simon, Jasvinder A. Singh ORCID, Vibeke Strand ORCID, George A. Wells and other authors.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Upload
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1).Methods.At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts.Results.The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms.Conclusion.We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.