Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SpringerOpen, EJNMMI Physics, S1(1), 2014

DOI: 10.1186/2197-7364-1-s1-a84

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 3(62), p. 628-633, 2015

DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2433897

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Accurate kinetic modelling using dynamic PET requires knowledge of the tracer concentration in plasma, known as the arterial input function (AIF). AIFs are usually determined by invasive blood sampling, but this is prohibitive in murine studies due to low total blood volumes. As a result of the low spatial resolution of PET, image-derived input functions (IDIFs) must be extracted from left ventricular blood pool (LVBP) ROIs of the mouse heart. This is challenging because of partial volume and spillover effects between the LVBP and myocardium, contaminating IDIFs with tissue signal. We have applied the geometric transfer matrix (GTM) method of partial volume correction (PVC) to 12 mice injected with $^{18}{rm F} - {rm FDG}$ affected by a Myocardial Infarction (MI), of which 6 were treated with a drug which reduced infarction size . We utilised high resolution MRI to assist in segmenting mouse hearts into 5 classes: LVBP, infarcted myocardium, healthy myocardium, lungs/body and background. The signal contribution from these 5 classes was convolved with the point spread function (PSF) of the Cambridge split magnet PET scanner and a non-linear fit was performed on the 5 measured signal components. The corrected IDIF was taken as the fitted LVBP component. It was found that the GTM PVC method could recover an IDIF with less contamination from spillover than an IDIF extracted from PET data alone. More realistic values of ${{rm K}_{rm i}}$ were achieved using GTM IDIFs, which were shown to be significantly different (${rm p} < 0.05$ ) between the treated and untreated groups.