Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ, 7601(334), p. 968.2-968, 2007

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39205.543843.be

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Delirium should be included in guidelines and curriculums

Journal article published in 2007 by Alasdair M. J. MacLullich ORCID, John M. Starr, A. Peter Passmore
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

One critical factor in the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of delirium in the United Kingdom is likely to be its unsatisfactory coverage in core guidelines and curriculums.Delirium is not mentioned in the draft guideline on acutely ill patients in hospital from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).1 However, it occurs in 11-42% of medical inpatients and missing the diagnosis can have serious consequences.2Delirium is also absent from the Joint Committee of Higher Medical Training curriculums for general internal medicine and acute medicine.34 “Acute confusional states” are mentioned in the latter, but only in the context of minimising distress. In the curriculum from the Royal Colleges of Physicians the sole reference to delirium is in the section on aggressive/disturbed behaviour,5 although only a few patients with delirium display aggression. “Acute confusion” appears in the top 20 presentations and the section on medicine in the elderly but with no mention of delirium.Care of patients would be greatly facilitated if delirium were covered adequately in core guidelines and curriculums. Consistent use of the term delirium and not its multiple, ill defined synonyms would reduce the terminological chaos and diagnostic imprecision which partly underpin the poor rates of recognition.