Published in

OpenAlex, 2019

DOI: 10.60692/yq1r4-z7m25

OpenAlex, 2019

DOI: 10.60692/kpysv-q5s13

Nature Research, Nature Communications, 1(10), 2019

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09671-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in neonates reveals widespread differential DNA methylation associated with birthweight

Journal article published in 2019 by 徐. 泽俊, Leanne K. Küpers, Leanne K. Küpers, Claire Monnereau, Claire Monnereau, Gemma C. Sharp ORCID, Gemma C. Sharp, Paul Yousefi, Paul Yousefi, Lucas A. Salas ORCID, Lucas A. Salas, Akram Ghantous, Christian M. Page, Christian M. Page, Sarah E. Reese and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

AbstractBirthweight is associated with health outcomes across the life course, DNA methylation may be an underlying mechanism. In this meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies of 8,825 neonates from 24 birth cohorts in the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics Consortium, we find that DNA methylation in neonatal blood is associated with birthweight at 914 sites, with a difference in birthweight ranging from −183 to 178 grams per 10% increase in methylation (PBonferroni < 1.06 x 10−7). In additional analyses in 7,278 participants, <1.3% of birthweight-associated differential methylation is also observed in childhood and adolescence, but not adulthood. Birthweight-related CpGs overlap with some Bonferroni-significant CpGs that were previously reported to be related to maternal smoking (55/914, p = 6.12 x 10−74) and BMI in pregnancy (3/914, p = 1.13x10−3), but not with those related to folate levels in pregnancy. Whether the associations that we observe are causal or explained by confounding or fetal growth influencing DNA methylation (i.e. reverse causality) requires further research.