Published in

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Genome Research, 8(28), p. 1147-1157, 2018

DOI: 10.1101/gr.234229.118

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Switching roles for DNA and histone methylation depend on evolutionary ages of human endogenous retroviruses

Journal article published in 2018 by Hitoshi Ohtani, Minmin Liu, Wanding Zhou, Gangning Liang, Peter A. Jones
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive genomic and epigenomic map of the more than 500,000 endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and fragments that populate the intergenic regions of the human genome. The repressive epigenetic marks associated with the ERVs, particularly long terminal repeats (LTRs), show a remarkable switch in silencing mechanisms, depending on the evolutionary age of the LTRs. Young LTRs tend to be CpG rich and are mainly suppressed by DNA methylation, whereas intermediate age LTRs are associated predominantly with histone modifications, particularly histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation. Young LTRs can be reactivated by treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) alone, but their level of expression is much increased by 5-aza-CdR treatment plus knockdown of one of several H3K9 methyltransferases or of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2. The removal of cytosine methylation led to rapid, widespread increases in H3K9me3 in the LTRs. Intermediate age LTRs had lower CpG densities and were not up-regulated by 5-aza-CdR treatment, but they were sensitive to knockdown of H3K9 methyltransferases. Unlike the situation in embryonic stem cells, the polycomb repressive complex (PRC2) has a minor role in LTR suppression by itself and is only a player after removal of cytosine methylation in the analyzed cancer cell line. Up-regulation of LTRs and induction of “viral mimicry” is rapidly becoming of interest for predicting cancer patient response to epigenetic therapies. Understanding the mechanism for LTR suppression is of major importance in order to improve patient treatment strategies.