Published in

American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Neurology, 23(90), p. e2086-e2094, 2018

DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005658

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

FGFR1 actionable mutations, molecular specificities, and outcome of adult midline gliomas

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ObjectiveTo characterize the prevalence and prognostic significance of major driver molecular alterations in adult midline diffuse gliomas (MLG).MethodsAdults with histologically proven MLG diagnosed between 1996 and 2017 were identified from our tumor bank, systematically reviewed, and reclassified according to WHO 2016. Targeted sequencing was performed, including determination ofH3F3A,HIST1H3B,TERTp,IDH1/2,FGFR1,p16/CDKN2A, andEGFRstatus.ResultsA total of 116 adult patients (M/F 71/45, median age 46.5 years) with MLG (17 cerebellar, 8 spinal, 30 brainstem, 57 thalamic, and 4 diencephalic nonthalamic) were identified. Most patients had high-grade disease at presentation (grade II: 11%, grade III: 15%, grade IV: 75%). Median overall survival was 17.3 months (14.5–23.8 months). Main molecular alterations observed wereTERTpromoter,H3F3A, and hotspotFGFR1(N546 and K656) mutations, in 37%, 34%, and 18% of patients, respectively.IDH1mutations only affected brainstem gliomas (6/24 vs 0/78;p= 7.5 × 10−5), were mostly non-R132H (contrasting with hemispheric gliomas,p= 0.0001), and were associated with longer survival (54 vs 12 months).TERTpromoter mutation (9.1 vs 24.2 months),CDKN2Adeletion (9.9 vs 23.8 months), and EGFR amplification (4.3 vs 23.8 months) were associated with shorter survival. Of interest, in contrast with pediatric MLG, H3K27M mutations were not associated with worse prognosis (23 vs 15 months).ConclusionsPatients with adult MLG present with unique clinical and molecular characteristics, differing from their pediatric counterparts. The identification of potentially actionableFGFR1mutations in a subset of adult MLG highlights the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis in this rare affection.