ECS Meeting Abstracts, 3(MA2018-01), p. 479-479, 2018
American Chemical Society, Chemistry of Materials, 18(29), p. 7961-7968, 2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002
Full text: Download
The garnet-type solid-state electrolyte, based on the nominal formula Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO), is unique in that it is a fast Li-ion conductor, exhibits sufficient mechanical properties, and is also chemically and electrochemically stable against metallic Li. Despite these promising attributes, additional challenges must be overcome before solid-state batteries based on LLZO are viable. Demonstrating low Li–LLZO interfacial resistance (R Li–LLZO) is a critical milestone along the path to commercialization. While several studies have characterized R Li–LLZO, nearly all report values significantly higher than conventional LIBs employing liquid electrolytes. Thus, strategies to reduce R Li–LLZO to values comparable to, or lower than, LIBs are needed [1]. In this study, the impact of surface chemistry on the interfacial resistance between the LLZO solid-state electrolyte and a metallic Li electrode is revealed [1]. Control of surface chemistry allows the interfacial resistance to be reduced to 2 Ω cm2, lower than that of liquid electrolytes, without the need for interlayer coatings. A mechanistic understanding of the origins of ultra-low resistance is provided by quantitatively evaluating the linkages between interfacial chemistry, Li wettability, and electrochemical phenomena. A combination of Li contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), first-principles calculations, and impedance spectroscopy demonstrates that the presence of common LLZO surface contaminants, Li2CO3 and LiOH, result in poor wettability by Li and high interfacial resistance. On the basis of this mechanism, a simple procedure for removing these surface layers is demonstrated, which results in a dramatic increase in Li wetting and the elimination of nearly all interfacial resistance. The low interfacial resistance is maintained over one-hundred cycles and suggests a straightforward pathway to achieving high energy and power density solid-state batteries. [1] A. Sharafi, E. Kazyak, A. L. Davis, S. Yu, T Thompson, D. J. Siegel, N. P. Dasgupta, J. Sakamoto, Chem. Mater. 29, 7961(2017)