Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 8(27), p. 882-891, 2018

DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0018

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Analytical Approaches to Measuring Total Nicotine Equivalents in Urine

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background: Total nicotine equivalents (TNE), the sum of nicotine and metabolites in urine, is a valuable tool for evaluating nicotine exposure. Most methods for measuring TNE involve two-step enzymatic hydrolysis for indirect quantification of glucuronide metabolites. Here, we describe a rapid, low-cost direct LC/MS assay. Methods: In 139 smokers' urine samples, Bland–Altman, correlation, and regression analyses were used to investigate differences in quantification of nicotine and metabolites, TNE, and nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) between direct and indirect LC/MS methods. DNA from a subset (n = 97 smokers) was genotyped for UGT2B10*2 and UGT2B17*2, and the known impact of these variants was evaluated using urinary ratios determined by the direct versus indirect method. Results: The direct method showed high accuracy (0%–9% bias) and precision (3%–14% coefficient of variation) with similar distribution of nicotine metabolites to literary estimates and good agreement between the direct and indirect methods for nicotine, cotinine, and 3-hydroxycotinine (ratios 0.99–1.07), but less agreement for their respective glucuronides (ratios 1.16–4.17). The direct method identified urinary 3HC+3HC-GLUC/COT as having the highest concordance with plasma NMR and provided substantially better estimations of the established genetic impact of glucuronidation variants compared with the indirect method. Conclusions: Direct quantification of nicotine and metabolites is less time-consuming and less costly, and provides accurate estimates of nicotine intake, metabolism rate, and the impact of genetic variation in smokers. Impact: Lower cost and maintenance combined with high accuracy and reproducibility make the direct method ideal for smoking biomarker, NMR, and pharmacogenomics studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(8); 882–91. ©2018 AACR.