Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15_suppl(35), p. e20560-e20560

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e20560

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Impact on OS of 2nd and 3rd generation TKI in EGFR mt+ and ALK+ patients: Results of the NOWEL network.

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

e20560 Background: Available clinical research data shows that early mutation testing for patients with NSCLC stage IV could lead to an effective choice of therapy for patients with proven mutations. Targeted therapies achieve a higher ORR, PFS, OS and a better quality of life than chemotherapy in mt+ patients. With the advent of 2nd and 3rd generation TKI´s effective in 1st generation TKI resistant tumors, we wanted to study the impact of these drugs on the outcome of patients in a real life setting in 3 lung cancer centers. Methods: 1383 patients from the three cancer centers diagnosed with NSCLC stage IV (UICC 7) were examined. Methods for the detection of mutations included Sanger Sequencing, hybridization based COBAS testing as well as hybrid cage next generation sequencing. Results: 880/1383 (64%) consecutive patients with non-squamous cell NSCLC from the cancer centers were studied for the presence of tumor mutations, especially for EGFR and ALK mutations. The EGFR mutation rate was 16.6% (141/880), and the ALK-translocation rate 3.8% (24/635). Median OS in EGFR mt+ patients was 31 (n = 78) vs. 32 (n = 38) vs. 16 (n = 14) months respectively (center 1 vs. center 2 vs. center 3). Median OS in ALK mt+ patients was 25 (n = 17) months in center 1 and 11 (n = 5) months in center 2 (p < 0.05). Use of 3rd generation TKI Osimertinib (n = 17) lead to a significantly higher OS (n = 17, median OS 67 mo) than the use of only 1st and 2nd generation TKI (n = 113, median OS 24 mo, p < 0.000). Similarly, use of 2nd and 3rd generation ALKi impacted significantly on median OS: Crizotinib alone n = 7, 17 months, Crizotinib followed by Ceritinib and/or Brigatinib (n = 9) median OS not reached, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Smalldifferences in OS were observed, depending on the treatment centers, but the use of multiple EGFR and ALK-I impacted highly significantly on the outcome of patients with EGFR and ALK-alterations in a real life setting.