Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15_suppl(35), p. 6088-6088

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.6088

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comprehensive genomic profiling of parathyroid carcinoma.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

6088 Background: Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare endocrine malignancy, which can cause life-threatening hypercalcemia. Initial surgery is often noncurative, and adjunctive radiotherapy and previous chemotherapies have not been shown to be effective. Previous studies identified recurring mutations in CDC73 and PRUNE2in a limited number of patients. We queried whether comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) would have potential to discover novel targets of therapy. Methods: DNA was extracted from 40 microns of FFPE sections from 13 consecutive cases of relapsed/metastatic PC. CGP was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of 672x for up to 315 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Genomic alterations (GA) included base substitutions (SUB), INDELs, copy number alterations (CNA) and fusions/rearrangements. Clinically relevant GA (CRGA) were defined as GA linked to drugs on the market or under evaluation in mechanism driven clinical trials. Results: Total of 13 specimens were identified from 7 male and 6 female patients. The mean age of the patients in this study was 54 years (range 38 to 76 years). All (100%) cases were Stage IV at the time of CGP. Tumor mutation burden was generally low - median mutation load per mega base was 1.8. There were 58 total GA (4.5 GA/sample) and 10 CRGA (0.8 CRGA/sample). The most frequent GA were non-CRGA mutations in TP53 (31%) and CDC73 (31%). MEN1 mutations were identified in 23% of cases. Frequent alterations in genes controlling cell cycle progression at G1 including CDKN1B, CDKN2A, CDKN2B and CDKN2C were identified (30%). The most frequent CRGA involved PTEN (23%), NF1 (23%) and KDR (15%). No alterations in BRAF or RETwere identified. A patient with KDR mutation treated with cabozantinib experienced > 50% drop in PTH level and radiographic partial response in 3 months. Conclusions: CGP identified previously unreported TP53 mutations in PCs and potentially actionable genomic alterations including PTEN, NF1 and KDR. Clinical benefit and response observed in a patient treated with VEGFR targeted therapy suggest that patients with this rare tumor may be candidates for targeted therapies.