Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Molecular Physics, 18-19(111), p. 2664-2673

DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2013.792959

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

X band rapid scan EPR of samples with long electron spin relaxation times a comparison of continuous wave, pulse and rapid scan EPR

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

X band room temperature spectra obtained by rapid scan, continuous wave, field swept echo detected and Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance FTEPR were compared for three samples with long electron spin relaxation times amorphous hydrogenated silicon T1 11 amp; 956;s, T2 3.3 amp; 956;s , 0.2 N C60 solid T1 120 160 amp; 956;s, T2 2.8 amp; 956;s and neutral single substitutional nitrogen centres NS0 in diamonds T1 2300 amp; 956;s, T2 230 amp; 956;s . For each technique, experimental parameters were selected to give less than 2 broadening of the lineshape. For the same data acquisition times, the signal to noise for the rapid scan spectra was one to two orders of magnitude better than for continuous wave or field swept echo detected spectra. For amorphous hydrogenated silicon, T2 amp; 8727; amp; 8764; 10 ns is too short to perform FTEPR. For 0.2 N C60, the signal to noise ratio for rapid scan is about five times better than for FTEPR. For NS0 the signal to noise ratio is similar for rapid scan and FTEPR