Published in

American Society of Hematology, Blood, p. blood-2018-05-849059

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-05-849059

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Prognostic impact of t(16;21)(p11;q22) and t(16;21)(q24;q22) in pediatric AML: a retrospective study by the I-BFM Study Group

Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Key Points t(16;21) translocations in AML comprise t(16;21)(p11;q22) (FUS-ERG) as well as t(16;21)(q24;q22) (RUNX1-CBFA2T3). Survival in pediatric AML with FUS-ERG is poor, whereas survival in RUNX1-CBFA2T3 is similar to other core-binding factor leukemias.