Published in

SAGE Publications, Tumori Journal, 2(104), p. 121-127, 2018

DOI: 10.1177/0300891618765580

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Assessment of bowel and anal sphincter function after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Purpose: To report long-term effects on anorectal function and bowel disorders and late toxicity rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Between 2000 and 2016, 201 patients treated with different neoadjuvant schedules of chemotherapy and radiotherapy doses were retrospectively analyzed. The Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center score was used for the evaluation of anal sphincter function. Results: The median follow-up time was 68 months (interquartile range 35–113 months). Radical resection was performed in 188 (93.5%) patients with a pathologic complete response rate of 26.4%. Overall sphincter function resulted excellent in 105 (52.2%) patients, good in 13 (6.5%), fair in 10 (5.0%), and poor (incontinence) in 40 (19.9%), with a persistent stoma rate of 16.4%. A further evaluation on 194 patients showed an improvement of sphincter function after 2 years in 11.9% of them. Seventy-three patients presenting stoma or poor sphincter function were re-evaluated for quality of life (QoL) indexes. Twenty-one (29%), 19 (26%), and 24 (33%) of them declared some variations concerning well-being, fatigue, and ability to perform daily activities. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence rates were 88.0% ± 2.6%, 86.3% ± 2.5%, and 94.6% ± 1.9%, respectively. Conclusions: In our study, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with good results in terms of sphincter function, late toxicities, and QoL indexes. A routine use of assessment scales could contribute to a better selection of patients with increased risk of developing functional disorders who could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.