Published in

Karger Publishers, Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra, 3(7), p. 173-180, 2017

DOI: 10.1159/000481459

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Frequency, Aetiology, and Outcome of Small Cerebellar Infarction

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Background and Purpose:</i></b> Strokes due to small (&#x3c;2 cm) cerebellar infarction are under-recognised, and their profile and aetiology have not been well characterised. We aimed to determine the frequency, clinical features, aetiology, and outcome of small as compared to large cerebellar infarction. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study is a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging features of a prospectively assessed series of 108 consecutive patients with acute cerebellar infarction admitted to Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, during 2011–2015. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of the patients was 67 years, and 33 (31%) had small cerebellar infarction. Compared to large cerebellar infarction, those with small cerebellar infarction had a comparable distribution of vascular risk factors but significantly less nausea and vomiting, gait disturbance, limb ataxia, and dysarthria. The posterior (<i>n</i> = 22, 67%) lobe was most commonly affected, followed by the anterior (<i>n</i> = 9, 27%) and flocculonodular (<i>n</i> = 2) lobes. Dizziness, limb ataxia, and nystagmus were significantly more common in patients with anterior lobe infarction. Vertebrobasilar disease was the presumed aetiology in 40 patients (37%), and was less commonly seen in small as compared to large cerebellar infarction. Cardioembolism affected 37% of the patients, irrespective of the size or topography of the cerebellar infarction, and there was no relation of supratentorial white matter lucencies (WMLs) to the size of cerebellar infarction. At 3 months, 65% of the patients were functionally independent (according to modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–2), and having a poor outcome was significantly related to moderate-to-severe supratentorial WML and large cerebellar infarction. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Small cerebellar infarction accounted for one-third of the ischaemic strokes in this location, most often involved the posterior lobe, causing fewer clinical features, and had a better clinical outcome than large cerebellar infarction. Patients with small cerebellar infarction require appropriate vascular management including investigation for a cardioembolic source.