Published in

Karger Publishers, European Neurology, 5-6(79), p. 272-280, 2018

DOI: 10.1159/000488450

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Secondary Prevention Three and Six Years after Stroke Using the French National Insurance Healthcare System Database

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Secondary prevention is inadequate in the first 2 years after stroke but what happens after that is less documented. The aim of this study was to assess the use and the adherence to preventive drugs 3 and 6 years after experiencing a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or an ischemic stroke (IS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The population study was from the AVC69 cohort (IS or TIA admitted in an emergency or stroke unit in the Rhône area, France, for an IS or a TIA during a 7-month period). Medication use was defined as ≥1 purchase during the studied year and adherence as Continuous Measure of Medication Acquisition ≥0.8 using the French medical insurance health care funding database. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study population consisted of 210 patients at 3 years and 163 patients at 6 years. Medication use at 3 and 6 years was, respectively, 80.9 and 79.8% for antithrombotics, 69.1 and 66.3% for antihypertensives, 60.5 and 55.2% for statins and 48.6 and 46.6% for optimal treatment defined as the treatment achieved by the use of the 3 drugs. Adherence to each class was good at 3 years and tends to decrease at 6 years. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> More than one patient out of 2 do not use the optimal preventive treatment.