Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, physica status solidi (b) – basic solid state physics, 8(254), p. 1600704

DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600704

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of wurtzite GaN/AlN and ZnO/MgO short‐period superlattices: Calculation of band gaps and built‐in electric field

Journal article published in 2017 by I. Gorczyca, H. Teisseyre, T. Suski ORCID, N. E. Christensen
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The group‐III nitride and the group‐II oxide semiconductors have direct band gaps, which cover the ultraviolet to infrared energy range. In this work we calculate the band gaps and built‐in electric field of the polar wurtzite GaN/AlN and ZnO/MgO Short Period Superlattices (SPSLs). In many respects GaN and AlN are similar to ZnO and MgO, respectively, especially regarding the band gaps and the lattice parameters. To realize the wider band gap based materials the superlattices (SLs) with GaN and ZnO as quantum wells and AlN and MgO as quantum barriers, that is, GaN/AlN and ZnO/MgO, are created. We found similar evolution of the GaN/AlN and ZnO/MgO band gaps with varying number of atomic layers constituting these SPSLs. Band gap bowings and strength of the internal electric field existing in these two families of SPSLs differ significantly.