Published in

British Institute of Radiology, British Journal of Radiology, 1070(90), p. 20160612

DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160612

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Diagnostic efficacy of single-pass abdominal multidetector-row CT: prospective evaluation of a low dose protocol

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Orange circle
Preprint: archiving restricted
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of single-pass contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (CE-MDCT) performed with a low-radiation high-contrast (LR-HC) dose protocol in selected patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease. Methods: 65 (32 males, 33 females; aged 20–67 years) consecutive patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease underwent single-pass CE-MDCT performed 70–100 s after i.v. bolus injection of a non-ionic iodinated contrast medium (CM) (370 mgI ml−1). In 46 (70%) patients with a clinical and/or ultrasonographic suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease, up to 1.2–1.4 l of a 7% polyethylene-glycol solution was orally administered 45–60 mins prior to the CT examination. Patients were then divided into two groups according to age: Group A (20–44 years; n = 34) and Group B (45–70 years; n = 31). Noise index (NI) and CM dose were selected as follows: Group A (NI = 15; 2.5 ml kg−1) and Group B (NI = 12.5; 2 ml kg−1). All patients of Group A underwent thyroid functional tests at 4–6 weeks. Final diagnoses were obtained by open (n = 12) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 4), endoscopy w/without biopsy (n = 24) and clinical (n = 19) and/or instrumental (ultrasonography) (n = 6) follow-up at 11 ± 4 months (range 6–18 mo.). Statistical analysis was performed by χ 2 and Student's t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 91.3 vs 95.4% (p = 0.905) and 90.9 vs 88.8% (p = 0.998) with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.1 vs 93.5% (p = 0.756), whereas the radiation (in millisievert) and CM dose (in millilitre) were 7.5 ± 2.8 mSv and 155 ± 30 ml for Group A and 14.1 ± 5.3 mSv and 130 ± 24 ml for Group B (p < 0.001), respectively. No patients of Group A showed laboratory signs of thyrotoxicosis at follow-up. Conclusion: The LR-HC has proved to be a safe and a dose-effective protocol in the evaluation of selected young patients with non-traumatic acute bowel disease. Advances in knowledge: (1) As reaching the highest diagnostic benefit to risk ratio (AHARA) appears to be the current principle of MDCT imaging, an increased amount of iodinated CM (0.7–0.9 gI ml−1) can be safely administered to young patients (<40 years) with normal thyroid and renal function to compensate for the lower image quality resulting from low-dose CT protocols performed with the standard filter back-projection algorithm. Such an approach will result in a significant reduction of the radiation dose, which could be otherwise achieved only using iterative reconstruction algorithms combined with either low tube voltage and/or low tube current protocols. (2) An optimal scan delay (T delay) for a venous phase caudocranial acquisition can be calculated by the following formula: T delay = CI + 25 − T SD, where CI is the duration of the contrast injection, 25 is the average of the sum of abdominal aortic and peak hepatic arrival times and T SD is the scan duration. With such an approach, the radiation exposure resulting from bolus tracking, albeit performed with low-dose scans, can be spared in patients with normal transit times.