Published in

Cambridge University Press, BJPsych Advances, 04(24), p. 237-244

DOI: 10.1192/bja.2018.15

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Big data: what it can and cannot achieve

Journal article published in 2018 by Peter Schofield ORCID, Jayati Das-Munshi ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

SUMMARYThis article looks at the use of large datasets of health records, typically linked with other data sources, in mental health research. The most comprehensive examples of this kind of ‘big data’ are typically found in Scandinavian countries, although there are also many useful sources in the UK. There are a number of promising methodological innovations from studies using big data in UK mental health research, including: hybrid study designs, data linkage and enhanced study recruitment. It is, however, important to be aware of the limitations of research using big data, particularly the various pitfalls in analysis. We therefore caution against abandoning traditional research designs, and argue that other data sources are equally valuable and, ideally, research should incorporate data from a range of sources.LEARNING OBJECTIVES•Be aware of major big data resources relevant to mental health research•Be aware of key advantages and innovative study designs using these data sources•Understand the inherent limitations to studies reliant on big data aloneDECLARATION OF INTERESTNone.