Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Sociologija, 2(59), p. 156-172

DOI: 10.2298/soc1702156p

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

On the application of Gaston Bachelard’s philosophy of science and epistemology to the problem of understanding in history of sociology

Journal article published in 2017 by Dejan Petrovic ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

Sketch of the methodological approach, alternative to presentism and historicism, based on the Gaston Bachelard?s philosophy of science and epistemology and its key concepts like epistemological break, epistemological obstacle and error, will be showed in this text. These two dominant methodological approaches in history of sociology and its similar disciplines try, each in its own way, to provide solution to fundamental problem of the said disciplines, thus the problem of understanding. In other words, how to come to the proper interpretation of specific author?s thought through the analysis of texts left behind him? As it will be presented below, the basic characteristics of presentism and historicism, and therefore their shortcomings, arise from the specific model of science on which these approaches are based upon. It is in this context the relevance of Bachelard?s philosophy of science and epistemology can be seen to the problem of understanding, or to put it in another way, to the solution of mentioned methodological approaches? shortcomings.