Published in

Wiley, Zygon, 2(52), p. 538-560, 2017

DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12334

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Laws in ecology: diverse modes of explanation for a holistic science?

Journal article published in 2016 by Rm Gunton, Francis Gilbert ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Ecology’s reputation as a holistic science is partly due to widespread misconceptions of its nature as well as shortcomings in its methodology. This paper argues that the pursuit of empirical laws of ecology can foster the emergence of a more unified and predictive science based on complementary modes of explanation. Numerical analyses of population dynamics have a distinguished pedigree, spatial analyses generate predictive laws of macroecology and physical analyses are typically pursued by the ecosystem paradigm. The most characteristically ecological laws , however, are found in biotic analyses in the functional trait paradigm. Holistic credentials for ecology may thus be restored on two bases : its accommodating complementary modes of analysis and explanation, and its having some laws within the least reductionistic mode consistent with its subject matter. These claims , grounded in the aspectual theory of Herman Dooyeweerd, lead to some suggestions for 19 enhancing the versatility and usefulnes s of ecology – and other sciences – by balancing different research paradigms under a holistic vision.