Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation Research, 8(118), p. 1254-1263, 2016

DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.115.307347

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Meta-Analyses of Human Cell-Based Cardiac Regeneration TherapiesResponse to Gyöngyösi, Wojakowski, Navarese, Moyé, and the ACCRUE Investigators: Controversies in Meta-Analyses Results on Cardiac Cell-Based Regenerative Studies

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In contrast to multiple publication-based meta-analyses involving clinical cardiac regeneration therapy in patients with recent myocardial infarction, a recently published meta-analysis based on individual patient data reported no effect of cell therapy on left ventricular function or clinical outcome. A comprehensive review of the data collection, statistics, and the overall principles of meta-analyses provides further clarification and explanation for this controversy. The advantages and pitfalls of different types of meta-analyses are reviewed here. Each meta-analysis approach has a place when pivotal clinical trials are lacking and sheds light on the magnitude of the treatment in a complex healthcare field.