Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

EDP Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, (612), p. A99, 2018

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731738

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

TheGaia-ESO Survey: open clusters inGaia-DR1

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Context.Determination and calibration of the ages of stars, which heavily rely on stellar evolutionary models, are very challenging, while representing a crucial aspect in many astrophysical areas.Aims.We describe the methodologies that, taking advantage ofGaia-DR1 and theGaia-ESO Survey data, enable the comparison of observed open star cluster sequences with stellar evolutionary models. The final, long-term goal is the exploitation of open clusters as age calibrators.Methods.We perform a homogeneous analysis of eight open clusters using theGaia-DR1 TGAS catalogue for bright members and information from theGaia-ESO Survey for fainter stars. Cluster membership probabilities for theGaia-ESO Survey targets are derived based on several spectroscopic tracers. TheGaia-ESO Survey also provides the cluster chemical composition. We obtain cluster parallaxes using two methods. The first one relies on the astrometric selection of a sample of bona fide members, while the other one fits the parallax distribution of a larger sample of TGAS sources. Ages and reddening values are recovered through a Bayesian analysis using the 2MASS magnitudes and three sets of standard models. Lithium depletion boundary (LDB) ages are also determined using literature observations and the same models employed for the Bayesian analysis.Results.For all but one cluster, parallaxes derived by us agree with those presented in Gaia Collaboration (2017, A&A, 601, A19), while a discrepancy is found for NGC 2516; we provide evidence supporting our own determination. Inferred cluster ages are robust against models and are generally consistent with literature values.Conclusions.The systematic parallax errors inherent in theGaiaDR1 data presently limit the precision of our results. Nevertheless, we have been able to place these eight clusters onto the same age scale for the first time, with good agreement between isochronal and LDB ages where there is overlap. Our approach appears promising and demonstrates the potential of combiningGaiaand ground-based spectroscopic datasets.