Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Research, 14_Supplement(76), p. 2821-2821, 2016

DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-2821

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Abstract 2821: Characterization of CDK inhibitors in a biochemical assay using a comprehensive panel of human CDK-cyclin complexes

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Members of the family of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) have been recognized as pivotal regulators of cell cycle progression for more than 20 years. Concordant to their central role in the control of cell division they have been in the focus of research of proliferation associated diseases ever since, most prominently amongst these cancer. Although initial results obtained from first and second generation, low specificity CDK inhibitors (e.g. Flavopyridol, Roscovitine, Dinaciclib, AT7519, R547) have been sobering the recent approval of the first CDK-inhibitor Palbociclib for the treatment of certain forms of breast cancer clearly demonstrates the suitability of cell cycle CDKs as targets in oncology. Furthermore, in addition to cell cycle CDKs a second group of CDKs have been shown to have important roles in the regulation of gene transcription, and several of the “transcriptional” CDKs have become interesting targets in oncology. Recent results underline the notion that for being effective in the treatment of cancer, CDK inhibition requires very high specificity towards the respective target CDK(s). For example CDK1 knockdown or CDK9 inhibition have been shown to be synthetically lethal in combination with MYC overexpression. Selectivity of compounds within the family of CDKs could so far only be tested using a quite limited number of CDK-Cyclin complexes expressed in human cells. To date there are 20 CDK genes and at least 17 different Cyclin genes described, many of which give rise to different variants, e.g. there are 3 D-type cyclins, two A- and E-type cyclins etc.. Experimental data indicates that at least 50-60 different, biologically relevant CDK-Cyclin complexes may exist, but only a limited number of these are available for biochemical testing of drug candidates so far. We have recombinantly expressed and purified 28 different CDK-Cyclin complexes, covering a significant part of the CDK family, and established in-vitro kinase-activity assays for these recombinant enzymes. The resulting CDK panel represents the most comprehensive array for biochemical testing of this enzyme group currently available. We characterized the specificity of several CDK inhibitors that have been or are currently in preclinical or clinical development with this CDK collection. Results will be presented showing the specificity of these inhibitors not only for CDKs but also for CDKs complexed to different Cyclins. In several cases we could detect signifcant differences in the inhibition of the same CDK complexed to different Cyclins, e.g. a 10fold difference was seen for CDK6 complexes with Cyclin D1-3. A >100 fold difference was detected for CDK3 complexed to either Cyclin E1 or Cyclin C. This screening panel allows generating data on compound selectivity early in development, diminishing the risk of designing a compound with suboptimal target specificity. Citation Format: Daniel Mueller, Frank Totzke, Thomas Weber, Christian Beisenherz-Huss, Diane Kraemer, Carolin Heidemann-Dinger, Constance Ketterer, Chris Eckert, Michael H.G. Kubbutat. Characterization of CDK inhibitors in a biochemical assay using a comprehensive panel of human CDK-cyclin complexes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2821.