Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astrophysical Journal, 1(837), p. 4, 2017

DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Propagation Characteristics of Two Coronal Mass Ejections From the Sun Far into Interplanetary Space

Journal article published in 2017 by Xiaowei Zhao ORCID, Ying D. Liu ORCID, Huidong Hu ORCID, Rui Wang ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from the Sun far into interplanetary space is not well understood due to limited observations. In this study we examine the propagation characteristics of two geo-effective CMEs, which occurred on 2005 May 6 and 13, respectively. Significant heliospheric consequences associated with the two CMEs are observed, including interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) at the Earth and Ulysses, interplanetary shocks, a long-duration type II radio burst, and intense geomagnetic storms. We use coronagraph observations from SOHO/LASCO, frequency drift of the long-duration type II burst, in situ measurements at the Earth and Ulysses, and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) propagation of the observed solar wind disturbances at 1 AU to track the CMEs from the Sun far into interplanetary space. We find that both of the two CMEs underwent a major deceleration within 1 AU and thereafter a gradual deceleration when they propagated from the Earth to deep interplanetary space due to interactions with the ambient solar wind. The results also reveal that the two CMEs interacted with each other in the distant interplanetary space even though their launch times on the Sun were well separated. The intense geomagnetic storm for each case was caused by the southward magnetic fields ahead of the CME, stressing the critical role of the sheath region in geomagnetic storm generation, although for the first case there is a corotating interaction region involved. ; Comment: accepted for publication in ApJ