Published in

Wiley, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 1(85A), p. 145-156, 2008

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31521

Wiley, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 1(87A), p. 282-282

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32162

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differentiation stage alters matrix control of stem cells

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Cues from the material to which a cell is adherent (e.g., adhesion ligand presentation, substrate elastic modulus) clearly influence the phenotype of differentiated cells. However, it is currently unclear if stem cells respond similarly to these cues. This study examined how the overall density and nanoscale organization of a model cell adhesion ligand (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid [RGD] containing peptide) presented from hydrogels of varying stiffness regulated the proliferation of a clonally derived stem cell line (D1 cells) and preosteoblasts (MC3T3-E1). While the growth rate of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts was responsive to nanoscale RGD ligand organization and substrate stiffness, the D1 stem cells were less sensitive to these cues in their uncommitted state. However, once the D1 cells were differentiated towards the osteoblast lineage, they became more responsive to these signals. These results demonstrate that the cell response to material cues is dependent on the stage of cell commitment or differentiation, and these findings will likely impact the design of biomaterials for tissue regeneration. ?? 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008