Published in

The Electrochemical Society, ECS Transactions, 13(45), p. 15-35, 2013

DOI: 10.1149/04513.0015ecst

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

(Invited) Interpretation of Dielectric Properties for Materials showing Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Impedance Response

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Models invoking Constant-Phase Elements (CPE) are often used to fit impedance data arising from a broad range of experimental systems. While the physical origins of the CPE are controversial, a bigger problem remains the interpretation of impedance data in terms of physically meaningful properties such as capacitance or thickness. Four models are used to interpret the CPE parameters associated with the impedance response of human skin and two metal oxides in terms of characteristic frequencies, film thickness, and dielectric constant. These values were compared against independent measurements. The power-law model developed recently by Hirschorn et al. provided the most reliable interpretation. Readers are cautioned that the CPE parameter Q does not provide an accurate value for capacitance, even when the CPE exponent is greater than 0.9.