Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Biostatistics, 1(14), p. 129-143

DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs030

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Signal Identification for Rare and Weak Features: Higher Criticism or False Discovery Rates?

Journal article published in 2011 by Bernd Klaus, Korbinian Strimmer
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Signal identification in large-dimensional settings is a challenging problem in biostatistics. Recently, the method of higher criticism (HC) was shown to be an effective means for determining appropriate decision thresholds. Here, we study HC from a false discovery rate (FDR) perspective. We show that the HC threshold may be viewed as an approximation to a natural class boundary (CB) in two-class discriminant analysis which in turn is expressible as FDR threshold. We demonstrate that in a rare-weak setting in the region of the phase space where signal identification is possible both thresholds are practicably indistinguishable, and thus HC thresholding is identical to using a simple local FDR cutoff. The relationship of the HC and CB thresholds and their properties are investigated both analytically and by simulations, and are further compared by application to four cancer gene expression data sets. ; Comment: 19 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables