Published in

Cambridge University Press, British Journal of Psychiatry, 6(198), p. 472-478, 2011

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085092

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Mixed anxiety and depressive disorder outcomes: prospective cohort study in primary care

Journal article published in 2011 by Kate Walters ORCID, S. Welch, Marta Buszewicz, Scott Weich, Michael B. King
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Mixed anxiety and depressive disorder (MADD) is common yet ill-defined, with little known about outcomes. Aims: To determine MADD outcomes over 1 year. Method: We recruited 250 adults attending seven London general practices with mild moderate distress. Three groups were defined using a diagnostic interview: MADD, other ICD-10 psychiatric diagnosis, no psychiatric diagnosis. We assessed symptoms of distress (General Health Questionnaire-28), quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), general practitioner (GP) diagnosis and consultation rate at baseline, 3 months and 1 year. Results Two-thirds of participants with MADD had no significant psychological distress at 3 months (61%) or 1 year (69%). However, compared with those with no diagnosis, individuals had twice the risk of significant distress (incidence rate ratio 2.39, 95% CI 1.29-4.42) at 3 months but not 1 year, and persistently lower quality of life (mental health functioning). There was no significant difference in GP consultation rate/diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority with MADD improved, but individuals had an increased risk of significant distress at 3 months and a lower quality of life. As we cannot currently predict those with a poorer prognosis these patients should be actively monitored in primary care.