Published in

Elsevier, Sedimentary Geology, 1-2(178), p. 135-139

DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.03.002

Elsevier, Sedimentary Geology, 1-2(178), p. 145-149

DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.03.004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sea level changes versus hydrothermal diagenesis: Origin of Triassic carbonate platform cycles in the Dolomites, Italy—Discussion

Journal article published in 2005 by Nereo Preto ORCID, Hinnov La, Linda A. Hinnov, Arndt Peterhänsel, Lawrence A. Hardie, Hardie La, Sven O. Egenhoff, Mark T. Harris, W. Blendinger, Harris Mt
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In a recent paper, Blendinger (2004) proposed that the limestone–dolostone couplets of the Middle Triassic Latemar carbonate platform should be interpreted as diagenetic features originating from hydrothermal processes, rather than as carbonate peritidal sedimentary cycles. Here we will show that Blendinger’s (2004) hydrothermal model is inconsistent with the available data, and should be rejected.