Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Research, 8_Supplement(73), p. 731-731, 2013

DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-731

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Abstract 731: In vivo fluorescence labeling of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) .

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common sarcoma, metastasizes hematogenously and peritoneally. Tumor-free margins and complete cytoreduction of metastatic disease are critical for decreasing recurrence. Since most GISTs overexpress KIT (c-KIT, CD117), we hypothesized that fluorescently labeled anti-KIT antibodies can improve detection of GIST. KIT K641E+/− transgenic mice that spontaneously develop cecal GIST, and wild-type C57BL/6 mice were used in this study. Wistar rat anti-mouse monoclonal c-KIT antibody was labeled with the AlexaFluor 488. The conjugated anti-KIT-Alexa 488 antibody (50-100 μg) was delivered via tail vein at 24 hours prior to standard staging laparoscopy. A pediatric laparoscopic grasper was inserted in the left lower quadrant for bowel mobilization in order to visualize the cecum. All 4 quadrants of the peritoneal cavity were examined systematically under both fluorescence and bright light. Post laparoscopy, mice were sacrificed and their abdomens exposed for Olympus OV-100 imaging. All tumors were resected and confirmed by H&E. We divided the mice into 4 groups. KIT K641E+/− mice received anti-KIT antibody (N=4) or control antibody (N=3). Wild-type mice received the same antibodies (N=3 per group). Fluorescence laparoscopy demonstrated a high tumor signal-to-background noise ratio. Upon whole body imaging used to detect gross tumors, there were 2 false positive and 0 false negative results, leading to an accuracy of 92%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were: 100%, 87%, 85%, and 100%, respectively. This method has several translatable applications: 1) identification of peritoneal metastases; 2) following disease response; 3) non-radioactive imaging; 4) endoscopic differentiation of gastric GISTs from leiomyomas or schwannomas; 5) laparoscopic staging; and 6) assessment of margin status. Citation Format: Cristina A. Metildi, Chih-Min Tang, Sharmeela Kaushal, Stephanie Y. Leonard, Paolo Magistri, Robert M. Hoffman, Michael Bouvet, Jason K. Sicklick. In vivo fluorescence labeling of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) . [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 731. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-731