Published in

Geological Society of America, Geology, 9(43), p. 803-806

DOI: 10.1130/g36868.1

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Determining vorticity axes from grain-scale dispersion of crystallographic orientations

Journal article published in 2015 by Zachary D. Michels, Seth C. Kruckenberg, Joshua R. Davis, Basil Tikoff
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Kinematic shear sense indicators are critical tools for tectonic interpretation of shear zones. The appropriate plane in which to interpret shear sense indicators is the vorticity normal surface , which is often inferred using fabric (foliation, lineation) orientation. Strain modeling, however, suggests that such fabrics can be unreliable for determining a kinematic framework. We demonstrate the application of a new quantitative method, crystallographic vorticity axis (CVA) analysis, that utilizes rotation statistics to calculate dispersion axes from crystallographic orientations at the grain scale. We apply CVA analysis to samples from three shear zones that exhibit distinct kinematics and deformation geometries. In all cases, the aggregate of calculated grain-scale dispersion axes yields a preferred axis of crystallographic vorticity at the specimen scale that is coincident with the independently determined bulk vorticity axis. This new method allows the position of vorticity axes to be evaluated independently of folia-tion and lineation information, and without assumptions about the kinematics of deformation.