Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Evolutionary Psychology: an International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 2(13), p. 147470491501300, 2015

DOI: 10.1177/147470491501300207

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

How men and women respond to hypothetical parental discovery: The importance of genetic relatedness

Journal article published in 2015 by Marco Bertamini ORCID, Minna Lyons
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Paternal uncertainty has shaped human behavior both in evolutionary and cultural terms. There has been much research investigating parenting as a function of genetic relatedness to the child, with a focus on male behavior, but the nature of these sex differences is hard to evaluate. We devised a hypothetical scenario that was as similar as possible for men and women to test whether, even in such a scenario, sex differences would remain strong. Participants were presented with the discovery that a child that s/he believed to be theirs was not carrying their own genes. Irrespective of sex, participants ( n = 1007) were more upset when the baby was not genetically related to them than when the child was genetically related but the sex gamete was not from a chosen donor. Women were more upset than men in both scenarios, but were more likely to want to keep the baby. The results are discussed with reference to evolved and rational mechanisms affecting parenting.