Published in

American Society of Hematology, Blood, 9(127), p. 1102-1108, 2016

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved outcome in newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We randomized 662 patients ≥65 years or transplant-ineligible to receive induction with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (CPR) or lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in triplet (MPR+CPR) vs doublet (Rd) lenalidomide-containing regimens. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the median PFS was 22 months for the triplet combinations and 21 months for the doublet (p=0.284). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the 4-year OS was 67% for the triplet and 58% for the doublet (p=0.709). By considering the three treatment arms separately, no difference in outcome was detected between MPR, CPR and Rd. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia: 64% in MPR, 29% in CPR and 25% in Rd patients (p<0.0001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities were similar among groups and were mainly infections (6.5-11%), constitutional (3.5-9.5%) and cardiac (4.5-6%), with no difference between the arms. In conclusion, in the overall population, the alkylator-containing triplets MPR and CPR were not superior to the alkylator-free doublet Rd, which was associated with lower toxicity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01093196.