Published in

Elsevier, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1(61), p. 35-40, 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1019

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Temporal Trends and Predictors in the Use of Aldosterone Antagonists Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We explored temporal trends in the use of aldosterone antagonist therapy among eligible patients with post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and reduced ejection fraction and characteristics associated with use in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend initiation of aldosterone antagonist therapy post-AMI for patients with an ejection fraction ≤40% and heart failure or diabetes before hospital discharge, in the absence of contraindications. METHODS: Data from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease national database were analyzed for 81,570 post-AMI patients from 219 hospitals between 2006 and 2009, of whom 11,255 (13.8%) were eligible for aldosterone antagonist therapy. RESULTS: Among eligible patients, 1,023 (9.1%) were prescribed an aldosterone antagonist at discharge. Aldosterone antagonist use varied from 0% to 40% among hospitals. Patient and hospital characteristics independently associated with prescription of aldosterone antagonists were a history of diabetes, heart failure, coronary revascularization, and larger hospital size. Those with a history of kidney dysfunction, tobacco abuse, and higher ejection fraction were less likely to be prescribed an aldosterone antagonist. From 2006 to 2009, the use of aldosterone antagonists increased from 6.0% to 13.4% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although rates of aldosterone antagonist use are increasing slightly over time, the vast majority of AMI patients eligible for treatment fail to receive it at hospital discharge. The reason for this discrepancy between guideline-based therapy and actual prescribing patterns is unclear and should be further studied.