Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Bentham Science Publishers, Protein and Peptide Letters, 1(20), p. 61-70

DOI: 10.2174/09298665130108

Bentham Science Publishers, Protein and Peptide Letters, 1(20), p. 61-70

DOI: 10.2174/0929866511307010061

Bentham Science Publishers, Protein and Peptide Letters, 1(20), p. 61-70

DOI: 10.2174/092986613804096874

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Why is Glycine not a Part of the Osmoticum in the Urea-rich Cells?

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Kidney cells of animals including human and marine invertebrates contain high amount of the protein denaturant, urea. Methylamine osmolytes are generally believed to offset the harmful effects of urea on proteins in vitro and in vivo. In this study we have investigated the possibility of glycine to counteract the effects of urea on three proteins by measuring thermodynamic stability, ΔGDo and functional activity parameters (Km and kcat). We discovered that glycine does not counteract the effects of urea in terms of both protein stability and functional activity. We also observed that the glycine alone is compatible with enzymes function and increases protein stability in terms of Tm (midpoint of thermal denaturation) to a great extent. Our study indicates that a most probable reason for the absence of a stabilizing osmolyte, glycine in the urea-rich cells is due to the fact that this osmolyte is non-protective to macromolecules against the hostile effects of urea, and hence is not chosen by evolutionary selection pressure.