Published in

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1(59), p. 1778-1782

DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591384

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Guidelines and Caveats for Manipulating Expectancies in Experiments Involving Human Participants

Journal article published in 2015 by Dev Minotra ORCID, Murat Dikmen, Catherine M. Burns, Michael D. McNeese
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In a number of domains involving decision making under high time pressure, the appearance of an unexpected critical event can startle operators causing errors that may potentially lead to a chain reaction of unfavorable events. Simulating such situations in a laboratory requires overcoming several challenges tied to human responses to unexpected and rare critical events. We discuss cases of experimental studies that have incorporated simulations, critical events, interruptions, predictive displays and ecological displays involving naïve and expert participants. We spell out guidelines and caveats pertaining to training, expertise, temporal variables, critical event frequencies, scenario design, mediator and moderator variables to name a few. The guidelines and caveats may inform researchers in the design of generalizable and reproducible experiments and in the analysis of data.