Published in

Public Library of Science, PLoS Biology, 1(12), p. e1001757, 2014

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?

Journal article published in 2014 by Jonathan A. Eisen, Emma Ganley ORCID, Catriona J. Maccallum
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Upload
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to animal research.