Published in

European Geosciences Union, Geoscientific Model Development, 3(6), p. 861-874, 2013

DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-861-2013

Copernicus Publications, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 1(6), p. 685-720

DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-685-2013

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Numerical issues associated with compensating and competing processes in climate models: An example from ECHAM-HAM

Journal article published in 2013 by H. Wan ORCID, P. J. Rasch, K. Zhang, J. Kazil ORCID, L. R. Leung ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the need for appropriate numerical techniques to represent process interactions in climate models. In two versions of the ECHAM-HAM model, different time integration methods are used to solve the sulfu-ric acid (H 2 SO 4) gas evolution equation, which lead to substantially different results 5 in the H 2 SO 4 gas concentration and the aerosol nucleation rate. Using convergence tests and sensitivity simulations performed with various time stepping schemes, it is confirmed that numerical errors in the second model version are significantly smaller than those in version one. The use of sequential operator splitting in combination with long time step is identified as the main reason for the large systematic biases in the old 10 model. The remaining errors of nucleation rate in version two, related to the competition between condensation and nucleation, have a clear impact on the simulated concen-tration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) in the lower troposphere. These errors can be significantly reduced by employing an implicit solver that handles production, con-densation and nucleation at the same time. Lessons learned in this work underline the 15 need for more caution when treating multi-time-scale problems involving compensating and competing processes, a common occurrence in current climate models.