Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Radiation Measurements, (75), p. 45-52, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.03.006

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Measurement of rectum dose by in vivo alanine/ESR dosimetry in gynecological 192 Ir HDR brachytherapy

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ESR spectroscopy using alanine was used for HDR BT dosimetry. The studies were conducted in phantom and in vivo. The aim was to verify if the dose in rectum complies with ICRU Report 38 recommendations. Only 1 of the 10 patients presented a rectum dose above the recommended level. a b s t r a c t High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) used in treatments of gynecological cancer often results in high doses in the pelvic organs at risk (OARs) and the complications in the rectum are a serious concern. Dosimetry procedures in vivo can be used as an evaluation method of calculated dose in treatment planning. One dosimetric method is the use of alanine with electron spin resonance (ESR) that has been used in different clinical practices. The aim of this study was to indicate the dose level in the female rectum volume, using alanine dosimeters during 192 Ir HDR gynecological BT, for cervical cancer. Doses were compared with the values obtained using the computational treatment planning system based on two orthogonal radiographic images. Firstly a phantom study in water was performed, enabling the in vivo study. Ten patients had the dose in rectum measured, resulting from 10 points properly referred; variations found were in the range of þ60% and À50% of the delivered doses compared to the treatment planning system. Differences between planned and measured doses can be mainly due to uncertainty of dosimeter position determination, averaging of dose points specified over the whole dosimeter position, uncontrolled changes in detector position during treatment due to rectum movement and to a simplified treatment system planning, that do not take into account the details of the patient anatomy and the difference among the tissues. Results show that improvements of the protocol treatment should be done to enhance the relation between treatment planning system and experimental results, nevertheless the dose at the OARs was lower than the recommended by the ICRU Report 38.