Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Age and Ageing, 6(25), p. 458-464

DOI: 10.1093/ageing/25.6.458

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Factors affecting Contrasting Results between Self-reported and Performance-based Levels of Physical Limitations

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We have examined the role of socio-demographic variables, cognitive and affective functioning, and personality in discrepancies between performance-based and self-report measures within three domains of physical limitations: motor functioning, hearing and vision. Data are drawn from a community-based sample of 624 persons of 57 years of age and older. The strength of the association between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitations is moderate. Socio-demographic variables and levels of cognitive functioning explained some of the discrepancies between self-reported and performance-based vision. Within the domains of motor functioning and hearing, discrepancies were substantially influenced by affective functioning and personality. The discrepancies may reflect bias in perception or true variation in the effect of limitations on daily functioning. Both self-report and performance-based measures seem to complement each other in providing useful information about physical limitations.