Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Innovation and Research in BioMedical engineering, 5(32), p. 298-301

DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2011.09.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

ICA versus CCA pour le débruitage de signaux épileptiques intercritiques : une étude comparative de performances basée sur la localisation de la zone épileptogène

Journal article published in 2011 by D. Safieddine, A. Kachenoura, L. Albera, G. Birot, F. Wendling, L. Senhadji ORCID, I. Merlet
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We propose in this study to compare the performances of two stochastic approaches (independent component analysis [ICA] and canonical correlation analysis [CCA]) to remove the muscular artefacts (EMG) from surface EEG signals in the context of epilepsy. The goal is to choose the method that better enhance the signals of interest (transient events called interictal spikes occur between seizures and background activity). In this paper, realistic EEG epileptic spikes are simulated from the activation of an epileptic patch. Real muscle artefacts and EEG background are then added to the simulated surface EEG. Such data allow us to quantify the performance of denoising methods since we have the "ground truth".