Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1(74), p. 97-115, 2013

DOI: 10.1177/0013164413502487

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Response styles and the rural-urban divide

Journal article published in 2013 by Troy Devon Thomas, Koen Abts ORCID, Patrick Vander Weyden
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This article investigates the effect of the rural–urban divide on mean response styles (RSs) and their relationships with the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents. It uses the Representative Indicator Response Style Means and Covariance Structure (RIRSMACS) method and data from Guyana—a developing country in the Caribbean. The rural–urban divide affects substantial mean RSs differentials, and it moderates both their relationships with and the explanatory power of the respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics. Within-country research is therefore subject to substantial rural–urban RSs bias, and it is hence imperative that researchers control RSs in such studies. Previous research findings should also be reexamined with RSs controlled. In addition, joint modeling of culture, RSs, and their sociodemographic predictors may clarify some of the conflicting results about their effects in the cross-cultural research literature.