Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley Open Access, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 6(37), p. 2003-2010, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16891

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pharmacokinetics of pimobendan after oral administration to dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPimobendan is an important therapy for dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD). The pharmacokinetics are reported in healthy dogs but not in dogs with heart disease.Hypothesis/ObjectivesTo determine if dog characteristics such as age, breed, body condition score, ACVIM stage of heart disease or biochemical laboratory value alter the pharmacokinetics of orally administered pimobendan and its metabolite in a cohort of dogs with naturally occurring MMVD.AnimalsFifty‐seven client‐owned dogs with MMVD ACVIM Stage B2, C, or D and administered pimobendan to steady state blood concentrations.MethodsProspective, observational study. Samples were collected using a sparse‐sampling protocol at specific intervals after administration of pimobendan. Plasma pimobendan and the active metabolite (O‐desmethyl‐pimobendan, ODMP) concentrations were determined via high‐pressure liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. Data was analyzed via a population pharmacokinetic approach and nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NLME). Numerous covariates were examined in the NLME model.ResultsThe absorption and elimination half‐lives (t1/2) were approximately 1.4 and 1 hour for pimobendan and 1.4 and 1.3 hours for ODMP, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable, especially the values for pimobendan absorption and elimination rate, and absorption rate of ODMP with coefficients of variation of 147.84%, 64.51% and 64.49%, respectively. No covariate evaluated was a significant source of variability.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceThe pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable among this group of dogs with MMVD. The variability was not associated with the dog's age, body weight or condition score, stage of heart disease, dose, serum creatinine, or alkaline phosphatase.