Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 16(46), p. 5468-5468, 2007

DOI: 10.1021/ie070743u

American Chemical Society, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 10(46), p. 2962-2973, 2006

DOI: 10.1021/ie060692l

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Framework for Sustainability Metrics

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This work presents the application of a new framework for sustainability metrics to industrial processes, in particular, to chemical processes. The sustainability of an industrial process can be evaluated using a set of three-dimensional (3D) indicators that represent all three dimensions of sustainability: economic, environmental, and societal. The four 3D metrics proposed in this worksnamely, material intensity, energy intensity, potential chemical risk, and potential environmental impactsare applicable to a wide range of process systems. The first two metrics are associated with the process operation. The remaining two metrics, potential chemical risk and potential environmental impact, respectively represent chemical risk to human health in the process environment, and the potential environmental impact of the process on the surrounding environment. To illustrate this framework and the applicability of the proposed set of 3D metrics, two case studies are presented: chlorine production process using three different alternatives (membrane, diaphragm, and mercury cells), and the separation of an acetone/chloroform mixture by two different solvents (benzene and methyln- pentyl-ether). Results of this study show that this framework can be effective in selecting the more-sustainable process by comparing process alternatives.