Published in

American Institute of Physics, Physics of Fluids, 3(34), p. 033308, 2022

DOI: 10.1063/5.0079313

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A sub-grid scale cavitation inception model

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Unresolved pressure fluctuations at the sub-grid scale (SGS) level of large eddy simulation (LES) or Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computations affect cavitation inception predictions, as SGS low pressures are simply ignored. We present a framework to take the unresolved SGS flow into account. Representing the SGS flow as canonical turbulence, in this paper, homogeneous isotropic turbulence (HIT), the pressure fluctuations, and transport and cavitating behavior of nuclei in such turbulence can be evaluated from direct numerical simulations (DNS) and used to create a model of cavitation inception that accounts for SGS fluctuations. To accomplish this, nuclei of different sizes were transported in DNS of HIT using their pressure history to drive the Rayleigh–Plesset equation that simulates bubble dynamics. In this way, expected average cavitation frequencies were tabulated for a range of SGS Taylor scale Reynolds numbers ([Formula: see text]), nucleus size, turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, and mean pressure. The model uses this table to estimate the cavitation event rate in each cell of a computational fluid dynamics solution. Inception can then be predicted by comparing the total cavitation rate with the detection criterion. The model is first assessed on two cases of HIT (at [Formula: see text] = 240 and 324) by comparing the pressure statistics, which it predicts in LES runs using the SGS cavitation model against the statistics of DNS. Then, a high [Formula: see text] (1660–1880) HIT flow is simulated using LES, and cavitation events are compared against experimental data. The inception model successfully predicts the inception pressure and the cavitation rates in the flow.