Published in

The Royal Society, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1953(288), p. 20210340, 2021

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0340

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

What constrains adaptive radiation? Documentation and explanation of under-evolved morphologies in Anolis lizards

Journal article published in 2021 by Steven Poe ORCID, Lorenzo A. H. Donald, Christopher Anderson
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Adaptive radiations fill ecological and morphological space during evolutionary diversification. Why do some trait combinations evolve during such radiations, whereas others do not? ‘Required’ constraints of pleiotropy and developmental interaction frequently are implicated in explanations for such patterns, but selective forces also may discourage particular trait combinations. Here, we use a dataset of 351 species to demonstrate the dearth of some theoretically plausible trait combinations of limb, toe and tail length inAnolislizards. For example, disproportionately fewAnolisspecies display long limbs and short toes. We evaluate recovered patterns within three species ofAnolis, and find that cladewide patterns are not evident at intraspecific levels. For example, within species, the combination of long limbs and short toes is not significantly rarer than long limbs and long toes. Differences in scale complicate inter- and intraspecific comparisons and disallow concrete conclusions of cause. However, the absence of the interspecific pattern at the intraspecific level is more compatible with selection favouring particular trait combinations than with ‘required’ forces dictating which trait combinations are available for selection. We also demonstrate the isometry of toe, tail and hindlimb length relative to body length between species but allometry in four of nine trait–body comparisons within species.