AbstractMany novel therapies to treat myocardial infarction (MI), yielding promising results in animal models, nowadays failed in clinical trials for several reasons. The most used animal MI model is based on permanent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery in healthy mice resulting in transmural MI, while in clinical practice reperfusion is usually accomplished by primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) limiting myocardial damage and inducing myocardial ischemia–reperfusion (MI-R) injury. To evaluate a more similar murine MI model we compared MI-R injury to unreperfused MI in hypercholesterolemic apolipoprotein (APO)E*3-Leiden mice regarding effects on cardiac function, left ventricular (LV) remodeling and inflammation. Both MI-R and MI resulted in significant LV dilation and impaired cardiac function after 3 weeks. Although LV dilation, displayed by end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic volumes (ESV), and infarct size (IS) were restricted following MI-R compared to MI (respectively by 27.6% for EDV, 39.5% ESV, 36.0% IS), cardiac function was not preserved. LV-wall thinning was limited with non-transmural LV fibrosis in the MI-R group (66.7%). Two days after inducing myocardial ischemia, local leucocyte infiltration in the infarct area was decreased following MI-R compared to MI (36.6%), whereas systemic circulating monocytes were increased in both groups compared to sham (130.0% following MI-R and 120.0% after MI). Both MI-R and MI models against the background of a hypercholesterolemic phenotype appear validated experimental models, however reduced infarct size, restricted LV remodeling as well as a different distributed inflammatory response following MI-R resemble the contemporary clinical outcome regarding primary PCI more accurately which potentially provides better predictive value of experimental therapies in successive clinical trials.