Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 10(40), p. 1966-1974, 2020

DOI: 10.1177/0271678x20918816

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Collateral status contributes to differences between observed and predicted 24-h infarct volumes in DEFUSE 3

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that in the DEFUSE 3 trial, the union of the baseline core and the 24-h Tmax > 6 s perfusion lesion predicts the infarct volume at 24 h. Presently, we assessed if collateral robustness measured by the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) index accounts for the variance in these predictions. DEFUSE 3 patients underwent MRI/CT perfusion imaging at baseline and 24 h post-randomization. We compared baseline and follow-up HIR and CBV index across subgroups stratified by differences between predicted and observed 24-h infarct volumes. Of 123 eligible patients, 34 with 24-h infarcts larger than predicted had less favorable collaterals at baseline (HIR 0.43 vs. 0.32, p = 0.006; CBV Index 0.78 vs. 0.85, p = 0.001) and 24 h (HIR 0.56 vs. 0.07, p = 0.004; CBV Index 0.47 vs. 0.73, p = 0.006) compared to 71 patients with more accurate infarct volume prediction. Eighteen patients with 24-h infarcts smaller than predicted had similar baseline collateral scores but more favorable 24-h CBV indices (0.81 vs. 0.73, p = 0.040). Overall, patients with 24-h infarcts larger than predicted had evidence of less favorable baseline collaterals that fail within 24 h, while patients with 24-h infarcts smaller than predicted typically had favorable collaterals that persisted for 24 h.